| Previous page |
|
||
....The causes of these various
monstrosities remain obscure. However, it appears that many are
attributable to disorders arising from long cultivation and repeated
crossings. Objections have been raised that monstrous flowers
are seen in plants growing side by side as well as among those
grown under conditions differing in dryness or humidity, but there
is no serious argument there.
.... From the lack of observed monstrosities
in the Juno, Oncocyclus, and Regelia groups and their hybrids,
it can not be concluded that hybridity does not play a role in
their origin, not as Mendelian inheritance, but in a manner similar
to nutritive disorders.
....As for viewing it as a mutation,
as has been suggested, that may perhaps be the exact explanation
when it concerns an Iris plicata Mme Chéreau with
wholly deformed flowers, but it is certainly not probable in all
the cases in which the same plant carries both normal flowers
and monstrosities.
....From the horticultural point
of view it is quite evident that the Irises with double flowers,
those of Clematis form, and the variegated ones are the only ones
which offer any interest.
Iris aphylla nudicaulis (Armitage) (1).
Bakeriana (Armitage).
coelestis (Vilmorin).
Delavayi (Armitage).
florentina alba (Armitage).
foliosa (= hexagona Lamancei) (Armitage).
germanica (Mottet, Vilmorin).
clarissima (Vilmorin).
Clematis (Cayeux).
Crépuscule (Vilmorin).
Dorothée (Vilmorin).
Edouard Michel (Mottet, Armitage).
(1). The names of those who made the observation
are within brackets.
| Previous page |
|
||